by Petter Johannessen, Director General, IFFO
“There is no alternative to sustainability” was one among the strong statements
delivered by the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) in early June when
presenting the 2020 State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture. How can
sustainability be assessed and ensure both food for an increasing population
and minimised impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems?
First, I suggest that we start with clarifying what is at stake. In this
respect, I welcome the FAO’s presentation of the status of fish stocks: by
volume, 78.7 percent of marine fish comes from biologically sustainable fish
populations. This means that 21.3 percent (in volume) and 34.2 percent (in
number) of fisheries need improvement.
Second, we need to consider that every food production system generates impacts
and has its own specificities. However, a shared vision is necessary to enable
an unbiased comparison to be made between all systems.
In the case of marine ingredients, a sector which is currently dominated by
fishmeal and fish oil, certification programmes exist, from MarinTrust and
Global GAP as well as FEMAS (whose certification unit is the fishmeal and fish
oil plant) to MSC (assessing fisheries). Through Chain of Custody standards,
by-products can be traced back to their origin, allowing for less fish to be
wasted and championing good practices versus IUU. It is MarinTrust’s ambition
to achieve full product traceability back to its origins, drawing upon
blockchain technologies in the new version of its Chain of Custody published
late July 2020. Today, over 50 percent of marine ingredients worldwide are
certified.
What about terrestrial ingredients? Why are the share of certified volumes so
low compared to marine ingredients? Two percent of soy and 19 percent of palm
oil production is currently certified. Intense scrutiny over ingredients
originating from oceans, as well as strong supply chain dependencies, explain
the interest that markets (consumers) have been demonstrating in favour of
certification programmes since the 2010s. Fish farmers, particularly those that
supply western markets, must meet high market expectations while chicken, pork
and beef producers are not held to the same set of expectations since they do
not have to compete with wild alternatives. The exposure of the marine ingredient
sector, and also of the aquaculture sector, is gradually being turned to its
advantage.
Read more, HERE.
The Aquaculturists
No comments:
Post a Comment