Supported by:





Thursday, September 17, 2015

17/09/2015: Adjudicator asks Acoura for further clarity on its determination to certify Echebastar’s tuna fishery

The independent adjudicator presiding over the objection process for the Echebastar Indian Ocean purse seine tuna fishery assessment has determined that he requires the conformity assessment body, Acoura, to review its determination to certify the fishery in respect to issues raised in the objection.

The Acoura team responsible for assessing the fishery to the MSC Fisheries Standard, and recommending its certification, will now have until 8 September 2015 to consider and respond to the points raised by the independent adjudicator, Eldon Greenberg.

Eldon Greenberg, a legal expert with extensive fisheries, legal, and mediation experience, requires the assessment team to review its scoring of Performance Indicator 1.2.2 of the MSC Fisheries Standard for each of the units of certification covered by the Echebastar assessment. This performance indicator relates to harvest control rules.

Next steps
Following Acoura’s response, the objectors, WWF and The International Pole and Line Foundation (IPNLF), will have an opportunity to input into this response by 15 September 2015. The independent adjudicator will then make a final decision on whether the issues raised have been adequately addressed.
     
https://www.msc.org/track-a-fishery/fisheries-in-the-program/in-assessment/Indian-ocean/echebastar_indian_ocean_purse_seine_skipjack_yellowfin_and_bigeye_tuna
Image: Prigalla
Assessment of the Echebastar Indian Ocean fishery
The Echebastar fishery entered into full assessment on the 22 January 2013. The assessment process has had two periods for stakeholders’ input in order to ensure the participation of all interested parties and consideration of all relevant and up-to-date information related to the fishery.

Independent adjudication was triggered by objections received from IPNLF and WWF. The independent adjudicator, Eldon Greenberg, has considered these objections alongside Acoura’s response to the objections. These were presented to him in a hearing on the 31 July 2015.

Further information about this assessment, including the determination by the independent adjudicator can be found on msc.org.
 

Read about the Echebastar Indian Ocean purse seine tuna fishery HERE.

The MSC objections procedure

The MSC objections process allows for detailed scrutiny and transparency in the application of the MSC Fisheries Standard by stakeholders. In accordance with UN FAO guidelines, and ISEAL requirements, fisheries are assessed to the MSC Fisheries Standard by a team of experts from an independent conformity assessment body (CAB). As part of this process, the MSC requires the CAB to seek and address input from all stakeholders. This is an essential part of a thorough and credible assessment of a fishery’s practices to ensure an unbiased, fair decision is reached.

Assessment includes a formal objections procedure to provide an orderly, structured process by which concerns about certification decisions can be lodged, reviewed and resolved, fairly and transparently by an independent adjudicator. The independent adjudicator is a legal expert, who has extensive legal and mediation experience as well as an understanding of the MSC Fisheries Standard and assessment methodology.
 

Read about the MSC’s objections procedure HERE.

The Aquaculturists
This blog is maintained by The Aquaculturists staff and is supported by the
magazine International Aquafeed which is published by
Perendale Publishers Ltd

For additional daily news from aquaculture around the world: aquaculture-news

No comments:

Post a Comment